Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The decree from the Bombay High Court, based on dishonored bills of exchange and cheques, constitutes a financial debt under the IBC. The respondent qualifies as a financial creditor. While interest is not a necessary component for a debt to be considered financial, the threshold for initiating Section 7 proceedings exists even without interest. The appellant's arguments regarding the absence of an agreement and non-applicability of Section 5(8) are unsubstantiated. The procedural defects cited by the appellant do not significantly undermine the validity of the claim u/s 7. The appeal is dismissed.
The decree from the Bombay High Court, based on dishonored bills of exchange and cheques, constitutes a financial debt under the IBC. The respondent qualifies as a financial creditor. While interest is not a necessary component for a debt to be considered financial, the threshold for initiating Section 7 proceedings exists even without interest. The appellant's arguments regarding the absence of an agreement and non-applicability of Section 5(8) are unsubstantiated. The procedural defects cited by the appellant do not significantly undermine the validity of the claim u/s 7. The appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
