<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bombay High Court: Dishonored Cheques Are Financial Debt Under IBC, Section 7 Proceedings Valid Without Interest Agreement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79164</link>
    <description>The decree from the Bombay High Court, based on dishonored bills of exchange and cheques, constitutes a financial debt under the IBC. The respondent qualifies as a financial creditor. While interest is not a necessary component for a debt to be considered financial, the threshold for initiating Section 7 proceedings exists even without interest. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the absence of an agreement and non-applicability of Section 5(8) are unsubstantiated. The procedural defects cited by the appellant do not significantly undermine the validity of the claim u/s 7. The appeal is dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bombay High Court: Dishonored Cheques Are Financial Debt Under IBC, Section 7 Proceedings Valid Without Interest Agreement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79164</link>
      <description>The decree from the Bombay High Court, based on dishonored bills of exchange and cheques, constitutes a financial debt under the IBC. The respondent qualifies as a financial creditor. While interest is not a necessary component for a debt to be considered financial, the threshold for initiating Section 7 proceedings exists even without interest. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the absence of an agreement and non-applicability of Section 5(8) are unsubstantiated. The procedural defects cited by the appellant do not significantly undermine the validity of the claim u/s 7. The appeal is dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>