Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellants wrongfully availed excess Cenvat credit beyond prescribed caps, failing to maintain separate accounts for common inputs/services used for taxable and exempted services during 2008-09 to 2009-10. Cenvat Credit Rules cap credit utilization at 20% for exempted services. Appellants entitled to opt for payment equivalent to credit attributable to inputs/services used for exempted services u/r 6(3A), requiring recalculation. Extended period invoked rightly as appellants deliberately didn't disclose non-maintenance of separate accounts. Penalty u/s 78 warranted for non-payment of service tax, quantum requiring redetermination. Matter remanded for recalculating recoverable credit, interest, and penalty after considering appellants' documents and calculations.
Appellants wrongfully availed excess Cenvat credit beyond prescribed caps, failing to maintain separate accounts for common inputs/services used for taxable and exempted services during 2008-09 to 2009-10. Cenvat Credit Rules cap credit utilization at 20% for exempted services. Appellants entitled to opt for payment equivalent to credit attributable to inputs/services used for exempted services u/r 6(3A), requiring recalculation. Extended period invoked rightly as appellants deliberately didn't disclose non-maintenance of separate accounts. Penalty u/s 78 warranted for non-payment of service tax, quantum requiring redetermination. Matter remanded for recalculating recoverable credit, interest, and penalty after considering appellants' documents and calculations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.