<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Recalculation of Cenvat Credit and Penalty Ordered Due to Non-Disclosure and Improper Claims for 2008-2010.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79158</link>
    <description>Appellants wrongfully availed excess Cenvat credit beyond prescribed caps, failing to maintain separate accounts for common inputs/services used for taxable and exempted services during 2008-09 to 2009-10. Cenvat Credit Rules cap credit utilization at 20% for exempted services. Appellants entitled to opt for payment equivalent to credit attributable to inputs/services used for exempted services u/r 6(3A), requiring recalculation. Extended period invoked rightly as appellants deliberately didn&#039;t disclose non-maintenance of separate accounts. Penalty u/s 78 warranted for non-payment of service tax, quantum requiring redetermination. Matter remanded for recalculating recoverable credit, interest, and penalty after considering appellants&#039; documents and calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=759124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Recalculation of Cenvat Credit and Penalty Ordered Due to Non-Disclosure and Improper Claims for 2008-2010.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79158</link>
      <description>Appellants wrongfully availed excess Cenvat credit beyond prescribed caps, failing to maintain separate accounts for common inputs/services used for taxable and exempted services during 2008-09 to 2009-10. Cenvat Credit Rules cap credit utilization at 20% for exempted services. Appellants entitled to opt for payment equivalent to credit attributable to inputs/services used for exempted services u/r 6(3A), requiring recalculation. Extended period invoked rightly as appellants deliberately didn&#039;t disclose non-maintenance of separate accounts. Penalty u/s 78 warranted for non-payment of service tax, quantum requiring redetermination. Matter remanded for recalculating recoverable credit, interest, and penalty after considering appellants&#039; documents and calculations.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 07:50:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>