Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Appellants wrongfully availed excess Cenvat credit beyond prescribed caps, failing to maintain separate accounts for common inputs/services used for taxable and exempted services during 2008-09 to 2009-10. Cenvat Credit Rules cap credit utilization at 20% for exempted services. Appellants entitled to opt for payment equivalent to credit attributable to inputs/services used for exempted services u/r 6(3A), requiring recalculation. Extended period invoked rightly as appellants deliberately didn't disclose non-maintenance of separate accounts. Penalty u/s 78 warranted for non-payment of service tax, quantum requiring redetermination. Matter remanded for recalculating recoverable credit, interest, and penalty after considering appellants' documents and calculations.
Appellants wrongfully availed excess Cenvat credit beyond prescribed caps, failing to maintain separate accounts for common inputs/services used for taxable and exempted services during 2008-09 to 2009-10. Cenvat Credit Rules cap credit utilization at 20% for exempted services. Appellants entitled to opt for payment equivalent to credit attributable to inputs/services used for exempted services u/r 6(3A), requiring recalculation. Extended period invoked rightly as appellants deliberately didn't disclose non-maintenance of separate accounts. Penalty u/s 78 warranted for non-payment of service tax, quantum requiring redetermination. Matter remanded for recalculating recoverable credit, interest, and penalty after considering appellants' documents and calculations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
