STGU: Appellants supplied generating sets/equipment on rental or...
Clients had effective control over rented equipment. Appellants paid taxes. Not a 'Supply of Tangible Goods for Use' service. Service tax demands unsustainable.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
STGU: Appellants supplied generating sets/equipment on rental or lease basis to clients for specified periods. Clients used equipment at their premises, obtained licenses, procured fuel, and controlled operations. Agreements showed clients had possession and effective control without interference from appellants. Appellants paid applicable VAT/Sales Tax. CESTAT held appellants' activities did not constitute 'Supply of Tangible Goods for Use' service u/s 65(105)(zzzzj) before 01.07.2012 or declared service u/s 66E after 01.07.2012 to attract service tax liability. Demands of service tax, interest, and penalties were unsustainable. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.