Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the issue of reimbursement of...
High Court: Starting production before approval doesn't deny incentives under Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy. Order set aside, payments due in 3 months.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The High Court addressed the issue of reimbursement of VAT/ET/SGST under Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011. The petitioner's claim was rejected due to starting production before approval by SIPB. The Court held that starting production before approval does not justify denial of incentives. The impugned order was set aside, directing authorities to grant incentives from approval date and make payments within three months. The petition was allowed.
The High Court addressed the issue of reimbursement of VAT/ET/SGST under Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011. The petitioner's claim was rejected due to starting production before approval by SIPB. The Court held that starting production before approval does not justify denial of incentives. The impugned order was set aside, directing authorities to grant incentives from approval date and make payments within three months. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
