Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues. Firstly, on cancellation of registration u/s 12AB(4), it found no violation as trustee appointments did not conflict with the Act. Secondly, unexplained security deposit was deemed premature to conclude as pending appeal challenges the addition. Thirdly, the construction and sale activity was not deemed a business venture u/s 2(15). Fourthly, allegations based on an inspector's report lacked evidence. Fifthly, no requirement to inform on property transfer under court permission. Lastly, cancellation due to lease deed changes was unfounded as per Trust Deed provisions. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, noting the jurisdictional error in registration cancellation.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues. Firstly, on cancellation of registration u/s 12AB(4), it found no violation as trustee appointments did not conflict with the Act. Secondly, unexplained security deposit was deemed premature to conclude as pending appeal challenges the addition. Thirdly, the construction and sale activity was not deemed a business venture u/s 2(15). Fourthly, allegations based on an inspector's report lacked evidence. Fifthly, no requirement to inform on property transfer under court permission. Lastly, cancellation due to lease deed changes was unfounded as per Trust Deed provisions. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, noting the jurisdictional error in registration cancellation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
