Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the condonation of a 335-day delay in filing an appeal before the CIT (A). The assessee's explanation, including difficulties related to obtaining documents from Norway and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, was deemed sufficient. The Tribunal found no intentional delay or negligence on the part of the assessee. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the Tribunal disagreed with the First Appellate Authority's rejection of the explanation. The case was remitted to the CIT (A) for fresh adjudication, with the directive to consider all relevant evidence and provide the assessee with a hearing. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.