Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed a refund claim regarding provisional...
High Court rules in favor of refund claim for seized betelnuts under Customs Act. Respondent ordered to refund Rs. 60 Lakhs in 8 weeks or face 12% interest.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The High Court addressed a refund claim regarding provisional release of seized betelnuts u/s 110A of the Customs Act 1962. The Court previously directed the respondent to provide an acceptable refund amount, which was not received. Consequently, the Court ordered the respondent to refund Rs. 60 Lakhs to the petitioner within 8 weeks upon proof of identity. Failure to comply would result in interest at 12% per annum. The petition was allowed, concluding the matter.
The High Court addressed a refund claim regarding provisional release of seized betelnuts u/s 110A of the Customs Act 1962. The Court previously directed the respondent to provide an acceptable refund amount, which was not received. Consequently, the Court ordered the respondent to refund Rs. 60 Lakhs to the petitioner within 8 weeks upon proof of identity. Failure to comply would result in interest at 12% per annum. The petition was allowed, concluding the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
