PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The High Court addressed a refund claim regarding provisional...
High Court rules in favor of refund claim for seized betelnuts under Customs Act. Respondent ordered to refund Rs. 60 Lakhs in 8 weeks or face 12% interest.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The High Court addressed a refund claim regarding provisional release of seized betelnuts u/s 110A of the Customs Act 1962. The Court previously directed the respondent to provide an acceptable refund amount, which was not received. Consequently, the Court ordered the respondent to refund Rs. 60 Lakhs to the petitioner within 8 weeks upon proof of identity. Failure to comply would result in interest at 12% per annum. The petition was allowed, concluding the matter.
The High Court addressed a refund claim regarding provisional release of seized betelnuts u/s 110A of the Customs Act 1962. The Court previously directed the respondent to provide an acceptable refund amount, which was not received. Consequently, the Court ordered the respondent to refund Rs. 60 Lakhs to the petitioner within 8 weeks upon proof of identity. Failure to comply would result in interest at 12% per annum. The petition was allowed, concluding the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
