Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The case concerns the cancellation of registration u/ss 12AA and 12AB of the Act, with a focus on the retrospective application of Section 12AB(4)(ii) introduced by the Finance Act, 2022. The Central CIT cancelled registration retroactively, citing this provision effective from 1.4.2022. However, the ITAT held that tax laws apply based on the year of assessment unless stated otherwise. Retroactive cancellation u/s 12AB(4)(ii) is invalid without explicit retrospective intent. Precedents like Auro Lab Ltd and Heart Foundation of India support this view, emphasizing that cancellation cannot apply retroactively. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in these cases.
The case concerns the cancellation of registration u/ss 12AA and 12AB of the Act, with a focus on the retrospective application of Section 12AB(4)(ii) introduced by the Finance Act, 2022. The Central CIT cancelled registration retroactively, citing this provision effective from 1.4.2022. However, the ITAT held that tax laws apply based on the year of assessment unless stated otherwise. Retroactive cancellation u/s 12AB(4)(ii) is invalid without explicit retrospective intent. Precedents like Auro Lab Ltd and Heart Foundation of India support this view, emphasizing that cancellation cannot apply retroactively. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in these cases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
