Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The case concerns the cancellation of registration u/ss 12AA and 12AB of the Act, with a focus on the retrospective application of Section 12AB(4)(ii) introduced by the Finance Act, 2022. The Central CIT cancelled registration retroactively, citing this provision effective from 1.4.2022. However, the ITAT held that tax laws apply based on the year of assessment unless stated otherwise. Retroactive cancellation u/s 12AB(4)(ii) is invalid without explicit retrospective intent. Precedents like Auro Lab Ltd and Heart Foundation of India support this view, emphasizing that cancellation cannot apply retroactively. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in these cases.
The case concerns the cancellation of registration u/ss 12AA and 12AB of the Act, with a focus on the retrospective application of Section 12AB(4)(ii) introduced by the Finance Act, 2022. The Central CIT cancelled registration retroactively, citing this provision effective from 1.4.2022. However, the ITAT held that tax laws apply based on the year of assessment unless stated otherwise. Retroactive cancellation u/s 12AB(4)(ii) is invalid without explicit retrospective intent. Precedents like Auro Lab Ltd and Heart Foundation of India support this view, emphasizing that cancellation cannot apply retroactively. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in these cases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
