Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case concerns the cancellation of registration u/ss 12AA and 12AB of the Act, with a focus on the retrospective application of Section 12AB(4)(ii) introduced by the Finance Act, 2022. The Central CIT cancelled registration retroactively, citing this provision effective from 1.4.2022. However, the ITAT held that tax laws apply based on the year of assessment unless stated otherwise. Retroactive cancellation u/s 12AB(4)(ii) is invalid without explicit retrospective intent. Precedents like Auro Lab Ltd and Heart Foundation of India support this view, emphasizing that cancellation cannot apply retroactively. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in these cases.
The case concerns the cancellation of registration u/ss 12AA and 12AB of the Act, with a focus on the retrospective application of Section 12AB(4)(ii) introduced by the Finance Act, 2022. The Central CIT cancelled registration retroactively, citing this provision effective from 1.4.2022. However, the ITAT held that tax laws apply based on the year of assessment unless stated otherwise. Retroactive cancellation u/s 12AB(4)(ii) is invalid without explicit retrospective intent. Precedents like Auro Lab Ltd and Heart Foundation of India support this view, emphasizing that cancellation cannot apply retroactively. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in these cases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
