Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The ITAT considered the addition of capital gain due to undeclared transaction. The property's ownership was crucial, as the property was not owned by the HUF as claimed. The claim of transfer under HUF partition was rejected as unproven. The "family settlement" theory was introduced late and not supported by evidence. The sale-deed executed was deemed taxable, as it involved a genuine transaction between the assessee and his brothers. The unexplained cash deposits were justified by the Cash-Book, leading to deletion of the addition. Overall, the capital gain addition was upheld, while the unexplained cash deposits addition was deleted.
The ITAT considered the addition of capital gain due to undeclared transaction. The property's ownership was crucial, as the property was not owned by the HUF as claimed. The claim of transfer under HUF partition was rejected as unproven. The "family settlement" theory was introduced late and not supported by evidence. The sale-deed executed was deemed taxable, as it involved a genuine transaction between the assessee and his brothers. The unexplained cash deposits were justified by the Cash-Book, leading to deletion of the addition. Overall, the capital gain addition was upheld, while the unexplained cash deposits addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.