Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT considered the addition of capital gain due to undeclared transaction. The property's ownership was crucial, as the property was not owned by the HUF as claimed. The claim of transfer under HUF partition was rejected as unproven. The 'family settlement' theory was introduced late and not supported by evidence. The sale-deed executed was deemed taxable, as it involved a genuine transaction between the assessee and his brothers. The unexplained cash deposits were justified by the Cash-Book, leading to deletion of the addition. Overall, the capital gain addition was upheld, while the unexplained cash deposits addition was deleted.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
