Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed various legal issues including jurisdiction, inquiry u/s 202 of the Cr.P.C., applications for production of bank statements, comparison of signatures, merging of charges, and clubbing of cases. The Court found that the inquiry u/s 202 was not conducted, and suggested filing a revision. Applications for discharge and production of bank statements were deemed not maintainable. The Court also rejected applications for signature comparison, stating cheques were admitted as security. Requests for merging charges were denied as charges were not framed. The Court emphasized filing revisions for jurisdictional issues and rejected writ petitions seeking interim compensation. The High Court dismissed all writ petitions, upholding the Trial Court's decisions.
The High Court addressed various legal issues including jurisdiction, inquiry u/s 202 of the Cr.P.C., applications for production of bank statements, comparison of signatures, merging of charges, and clubbing of cases. The Court found that the inquiry u/s 202 was not conducted, and suggested filing a revision. Applications for discharge and production of bank statements were deemed not maintainable. The Court also rejected applications for signature comparison, stating cheques were admitted as security. Requests for merging charges were denied as charges were not framed. The Court emphasized filing revisions for jurisdictional issues and rejected writ petitions seeking interim compensation. The High Court dismissed all writ petitions, upholding the Trial Court's decisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.