https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78894 The High Court addressed various legal issues including jurisdiction, inquiry u/s 202 of the Cr.P.C., applications for production of bank statements, comparison of signatures, merging of charges, and clubbing of cases. The Court found that the inquiry u/s 202 was not conducted, and suggested filing a revision. Applications for discharge and production of bank statements were deemed not maintainable. The Court also rejected applications for signature comparison, stating cheques were admitted as security. Requests for merging charges were denied as charges were not framed. The Court emphasized filing revisions for jurisdictional issues and rejected writ petitions seeking interim compensation. The High Court dismissed all writ petitions, upholding the Trial Court's decisions. en-us Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:18:11 +0530 Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:18:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78894 The High Court addressed various legal issues including jurisdiction, inquiry u/s 202 of the Cr.P.C., applications for production of bank statements, comparison of signatures, merging of charges, and clubbing of cases. The Court found that the inquiry u/s 202 was not conducted, and suggested filing a revision. Applications for discharge and production of bank statements were deemed not maintainable. The Court also rejected applications for signature comparison, stating cheques were admitted as security. Requests for merging charges were denied as charges were not framed. The Court emphasized filing revisions for jurisdictional issues and rejected writ petitions seeking interim compensation. The High Court dismissed all writ petitions, upholding the Trial Court's decisions. Highlights Indian Laws Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:18:11 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78894