Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving the revision u/s 263 for non-deduction of tax at source on salary and commission payments. The CIT argued that the AO did not disallow u/s 40(a)(ia). The ITAT held that if the recipient of income has declared and paid taxes on income where no TDS was deducted, the assessee is not in default per Second Proviso to Section 40(a)(ia). The ITAT found that the recipient had declared and paid taxes on salary and commission income. The ITAT disagreed with the PCIT's failure to consider these facts during the 263 proceedings. The ITAT allowed the appeal, stating that TDS on commission should be disallowed and added to the assessee's income for the relevant assessment year.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving the revision u/s 263 for non-deduction of tax at source on salary and commission payments. The CIT argued that the AO did not disallow u/s 40(a)(ia). The ITAT held that if the recipient of income has declared and paid taxes on income where no TDS was deducted, the assessee is not in default per Second Proviso to Section 40(a)(ia). The ITAT found that the recipient had declared and paid taxes on salary and commission income. The ITAT disagreed with the PCIT's failure to consider these facts during the 263 proceedings. The ITAT allowed the appeal, stating that TDS on commission should be disallowed and added to the assessee's income for the relevant assessment year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.