Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving the revision u/s 263 for non-deduction of tax at source on salary and commission payments. The CIT argued that the AO did not disallow u/s 40(a)(ia). The ITAT held that if the recipient of income has declared and paid taxes on income where no TDS was deducted, the assessee is not in default per Second Proviso to Section 40(a)(ia). The ITAT found that the recipient had declared and paid taxes on salary and commission income. The ITAT disagreed with the PCIT's failure to consider these facts during the 263 proceedings. The ITAT allowed the appeal, stating that TDS on commission should be disallowed and added to the assessee's income for the relevant assessment year.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving the revision u/s 263 for non-deduction of tax at source on salary and commission payments. The CIT argued that the AO did not disallow u/s 40(a)(ia). The ITAT held that if the recipient of income has declared and paid taxes on income where no TDS was deducted, the assessee is not in default per Second Proviso to Section 40(a)(ia). The ITAT found that the recipient had declared and paid taxes on salary and commission income. The ITAT disagreed with the PCIT's failure to consider these facts during the 263 proceedings. The ITAT allowed the appeal, stating that TDS on commission should be disallowed and added to the assessee's income for the relevant assessment year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
