Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The High Court addressed a challenge to appellate orders rejecting appeals as time-barred u/s 107 of GST enactments. The petitioner's appeals were filed 21 to 24 days beyond the limitation period but explained the delay due to rectification petitions. The petitioner paid 10% of the disputed tax and had funds appropriated from their bank account. The Court directed the appellate authority to accept and decide the appeals on merits without considering the limitation issue. The impugned orders were quashed, and the bank attachment was lifted. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court addressed a challenge to appellate orders rejecting appeals as time-barred u/s 107 of GST enactments. The petitioner's appeals were filed 21 to 24 days beyond the limitation period but explained the delay due to rectification petitions. The petitioner paid 10% of the disputed tax and had funds appropriated from their bank account. The Court directed the appellate authority to accept and decide the appeals on merits without considering the limitation issue. The impugned orders were quashed, and the bank attachment was lifted. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
