Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a deduction. The Tribunal noted a previous year's treatment by AO as "income from other sources" and rejection of the deduction claim. The CIT(A) later allowed the deduction for the previous year, stating the interest income was part of operational income u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal found the PCIT's revision u/s 263 invalid, as the interest income was deemed part of operational income due to statutory compulsions. The Assessment Order granting the deduction was upheld, and the PCIT's order u/s 263 was quashed. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a deduction. The Tribunal noted a previous year's treatment by AO as "income from other sources" and rejection of the deduction claim. The CIT(A) later allowed the deduction for the previous year, stating the interest income was part of operational income u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal found the PCIT's revision u/s 263 invalid, as the interest income was deemed part of operational income due to statutory compulsions. The Assessment Order granting the deduction was upheld, and the PCIT's order u/s 263 was quashed. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
