<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interest income from FDs with SCDCC Bank allowed as deduction under 80P(2)(a)(i). Revision under sec 263 not valid. Appeal allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78794</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a deduction. The Tribunal noted a previous year&#039;s treatment by AO as &quot;income from other sources&quot; and rejection of the deduction claim. The CIT(A) later allowed the deduction for the previous year, stating the interest income was part of operational income u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal found the PCIT&#039;s revision u/s 263 invalid, as the interest income was deemed part of operational income due to statutory compulsions. The Assessment Order granting the deduction was upheld, and the PCIT&#039;s order u/s 263 was quashed. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:36:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:36:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=757426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interest income from FDs with SCDCC Bank allowed as deduction under 80P(2)(a)(i). Revision under sec 263 not valid. Appeal allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78794</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a deduction. The Tribunal noted a previous year&#039;s treatment by AO as &quot;income from other sources&quot; and rejection of the deduction claim. The CIT(A) later allowed the deduction for the previous year, stating the interest income was part of operational income u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal found the PCIT&#039;s revision u/s 263 invalid, as the interest income was deemed part of operational income due to statutory compulsions. The Assessment Order granting the deduction was upheld, and the PCIT&#039;s order u/s 263 was quashed. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:36:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>