Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJune 22, 2024Case LawsTri
The Tribunal addressed the maintainability of an application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by an Operational Creditor (OC) against a Corporate Debtor (CD). The OC claimed default in payment by the CD but failed to provide invoices as evidence. Despite a demand notice under Section 8 of the IBC and a bank statement showing a partial payment, the Tribunal found the application time-barred as it was filed beyond the three-year limitation period from the alleged default date. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proving debt and default before initiating CIRP, ultimately rejecting the application under Section 9 of the IBC.
The Tribunal addressed the maintainability of an application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by an Operational Creditor (OC) against a Corporate Debtor (CD). The OC claimed default in payment by the CD but failed to provide invoices as evidence. Despite a demand notice under Section 8 of the IBC and a bank statement showing a partial payment, the Tribunal found the application time-barred as it was filed beyond the three-year limitation period from the alleged default date. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proving debt and default before initiating CIRP, ultimately rejecting the application under Section 9 of the IBC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
