Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case pertains to taxability of income in India related to royalty and fees for technical services. The Appellate Tribunal held that license fees received by a company for granting trademark rights are taxable in India as business income u/s 9. The company entered into a Hotel Management Agreement, providing marketing and reservation services. Payments made for System Fund support services and SCHI Facility charges were held not to be Royalty/FTS and hence not taxable. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify Travel Agent Commission receipts to determine if they are reimbursement in nature, in line with previous decisions. The Assessee can submit further details to support their claim.
The case pertains to taxability of income in India related to royalty and fees for technical services. The Appellate Tribunal held that license fees received by a company for granting trademark rights are taxable in India as business income u/s 9. The company entered into a Hotel Management Agreement, providing marketing and reservation services. Payments made for System Fund support services and SCHI Facility charges were held not to be Royalty/FTS and hence not taxable. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify Travel Agent Commission receipts to determine if they are reimbursement in nature, in line with previous decisions. The Assessee can submit further details to support their claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.