Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The case pertains to taxability of income in India related to royalty and fees for technical services. The Appellate Tribunal held that license fees received by a company for granting trademark rights are taxable in India as business income u/s 9. The company entered into a Hotel Management Agreement, providing marketing and reservation services. Payments made for System Fund support services and SCHI Facility charges were held not to be Royalty/FTS and hence not taxable. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify Travel Agent Commission receipts to determine if they are reimbursement in nature, in line with previous decisions. The Assessee can submit further details to support their claim.
The case pertains to taxability of income in India related to royalty and fees for technical services. The Appellate Tribunal held that license fees received by a company for granting trademark rights are taxable in India as business income u/s 9. The company entered into a Hotel Management Agreement, providing marketing and reservation services. Payments made for System Fund support services and SCHI Facility charges were held not to be Royalty/FTS and hence not taxable. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify Travel Agent Commission receipts to determine if they are reimbursement in nature, in line with previous decisions. The Assessee can submit further details to support their claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
