Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The case involved legality of assessment u/s 153A without search or Panchnama. The search warrant named the assessee company, rejecting the objection. No incriminating material was found during search, challenging the applicability of section 153A. Unexplained cash credit additions lacked proper investigation, leading to deletion of Rs. 3,70,000 addition. Income deposited in cash was declared and documented, leading to deletion of Rs. 10,50,000 addition. Addition u/s 68 was disputed, with relief granted by CIT(A). Disallowance of depreciation on vehicle was found baseless. CIT(A) upheld unexplained cash credit appeal, rejecting Department's challenge on genuineness. Overall, Department's appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit.
The case involved legality of assessment u/s 153A without search or Panchnama. The search warrant named the assessee company, rejecting the objection. No incriminating material was found during search, challenging the applicability of section 153A. Unexplained cash credit additions lacked proper investigation, leading to deletion of Rs. 3,70,000 addition. Income deposited in cash was declared and documented, leading to deletion of Rs. 10,50,000 addition. Addition u/s 68 was disputed, with relief granted by CIT(A). Disallowance of depreciation on vehicle was found baseless. CIT(A) upheld unexplained cash credit appeal, rejecting Department's challenge on genuineness. Overall, Department's appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
