Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal considered the entitlement to duty exemption u/s N/N. 25/2023-CUS for the import of Lithium Ion Battery under a Transferrable DFIA License. The issue was whether the battery falls under the description of "Automative Battery" as per the license. The respondent argued that the imported Lithium Battery is a type of automotive battery, supported by a certificate from IIT engineers. The Tribunal emphasized the "capability of use" of the battery, not just similarity to other automotive batteries. It upheld that the DFIA scheme allows for broad categorization under "capable of being used in electrical vehicles." The appeal by the Department was dismissed, granting relief to the respondent.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the entitlement to duty exemption u/s N/N. 25/2023-CUS for the import of Lithium Ion Battery under a Transferrable DFIA License. The issue was whether the battery falls under the description of "Automative Battery" as per the license. The respondent argued that the imported Lithium Battery is a type of automotive battery, supported by a certificate from IIT engineers. The Tribunal emphasized the "capability of use" of the battery, not just similarity to other automotive batteries. It upheld that the DFIA scheme allows for broad categorization under "capable of being used in electrical vehicles." The appeal by the Department was dismissed, granting relief to the respondent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
