DFIA exemption for lithium ion batteries upheld where goods matched the licensed description and no actual-use condition applied.

Lithium ion batteries imported under a transferable DFIA licence were treated as covered by the description "automotive battery" for customs duty exemption purposes. The Tribunal applied the DFIA scheme on the basis that entitlement depends on whether the imported goods are capable of use within the licensed description, not on proof of actual use in the exported product. It further held that export promotion notifications must be construed liberally once eligibility is established, and that no express actual-user condition or one-to-one correlation was shown. Technical material supported the conclusion that the batteries could function as automotive batteries for electric tractors, so the exemption could not be denied on tariff-classification mismatch.

---

---

Issues: Whether lithium ion batteries imported under the transferable DFIA licence were covered by the description "Automotive Battery" and were therefore eligible for customs duty exemption under the applicable notification.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the interpretation of the DFIA scheme and the exemption notification governing duty-free import against the licence. The Tribunal held that for DFIA benefits, the controlling test is whether the imported item is capable of being used against the licensed description, and not whether it was actually used in the exported product. It further held that export promotion notifications and schemes are to be construed liberally once the threshold of eligibility is met, and that no actual user condition or one-to-one correlation was shown to exist for the imported lithium ion batteries. The Tribunal also accepted the technical material indicating that lithium ion batteries could function as automotive batteries for electric tractors, and found that the description, value and quantity in the DFIA were satisfied. The mismatch in tariff classification or the department's reliance on actual use was held insufficient to deny the benefit.

Conclusion: The imported lithium ion batteries were held to fall within the DFIA description of automotive battery and the denial of exemption was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The departmental challenge failed and the assessee retained the DFIA-linked duty exemption on the imported goods.

Ratio Decidendi: Under the DFIA scheme, entitlement depends on whether the imported goods are capable of use within the licensed description, and export promotion exemptions are to be construed liberally without insisting on actual use or one-to-one correlation unless the scheme expressly so provides.

---