Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether melamine was covered by the advance licence as a permissible import under the expression "syntan", and whether the exemption benefit under Notification No. 203/92 could therefore be denied.
Analysis: The material showed that melamine, though not itself the final active tanning substance, was commonly understood and accepted in the trade and by the licensing authority as a synthetic tanning agent. The technical opinions did not rule out its use in leather tanning; rather, they indicated that melamine, with formaldehyde or by polymeric formation in situ, could produce the tanning effect. Subsequent licences also treated melamine as an item permissible for import as a synthetic tanning agent. In that view, the Commissioner (Appeals) was justified in holding that the goods were covered by the licence.
Conclusion: The exclusion of melamine from the licence was not justified, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The order allowing the importer the benefit of the licence and the exemption was upheld, and the appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a licensed item is understood in trade and licensing practice to include a substance capable of being used as a synthetic tanning agent, the import is to be treated as covered by the licence even if the substance operates through reaction with another ingredient to produce the active tanning effect.