Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal considered the entitlement to duty exemption u/s N/N. 25/2023-CUS for the import of Lithium Ion Battery under a Transferrable DFIA License. The issue was whether the battery falls under the description of "Automative Battery" as per the license. The respondent argued that the imported Lithium Battery is a type of automotive battery, supported by a certificate from IIT engineers. The Tribunal emphasized the "capability of use" of the battery, not just similarity to other automotive batteries. It upheld that the DFIA scheme allows for broad categorization under "capable of being used in electrical vehicles." The appeal by the Department was dismissed, granting relief to the respondent.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the entitlement to duty exemption u/s N/N. 25/2023-CUS for the import of Lithium Ion Battery under a Transferrable DFIA License. The issue was whether the battery falls under the description of "Automative Battery" as per the license. The respondent argued that the imported Lithium Battery is a type of automotive battery, supported by a certificate from IIT engineers. The Tribunal emphasized the "capability of use" of the battery, not just similarity to other automotive batteries. It upheld that the DFIA scheme allows for broad categorization under "capable of being used in electrical vehicles." The appeal by the Department was dismissed, granting relief to the respondent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
