Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
The High Court held that forceful possession of property can be considered proceeds of crime u/s 2(1)(u) of PMLA. Money laundering involves any activity connected with proceeds of crime derived from criminal activity. Illegal possession of property falls within the definition of property u/s 2(1)(v) of PMLA. Even attempts to conceal, possess, or use proceeds of crime constitute money laundering. The court upheld the validity of section 19 of PMLA. The ED's case against the petitioner is supported by evidence, and the legality of subsequent remand orders does not affect the initial arrest. The petitioner's petition was dismissed.
The High Court held that forceful possession of property can be considered proceeds of crime u/s 2(1)(u) of PMLA. Money laundering involves any activity connected with proceeds of crime derived from criminal activity. Illegal possession of property falls within the definition of property u/s 2(1)(v) of PMLA. Even attempts to conceal, possess, or use proceeds of crime constitute money laundering. The court upheld the validity of section 19 of PMLA. The ED's case against the petitioner is supported by evidence, and the legality of subsequent remand orders does not affect the initial arrest. The petitioner's petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
