Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Money laundering case: Illegal possession of property can be proceeds of crime. Attempt to conceal, possess, or use crime proceeds is covered.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The High Court held that forceful possession of property can be considered proceeds of crime u/s 2(1)(u) of PMLA. Money laundering involves any activity connected with proceeds of crime derived from criminal activity. Illegal possession of property falls within the definition of property u/s 2(1)(v) of PMLA. Even attempts to conceal, possess, or use proceeds of crime constitute money laundering. The court upheld the validity of section 19 of PMLA. The ED's case against the petitioner is supported by evidence, and the legality of subsequent remand orders does not affect the initial arrest. The petitioner's petition was dismissed.....