Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the taxability of Unincorporated Joint Ventures involving revenue sharing arrangements and support services of business or commerce (BSS). The appellant provided cinema hall and infrastructure to a distributor for movie exhibition, without paying appropriate service tax. Referring to precedents like PVS Multiplex and Inox Leisure, the Tribunal held that service tax cannot be imposed on the appellant u/s BSS. The Supreme Court upheld this view, affirming the Tribunal's correctness. The case is now with the Division Bench for appeal decision.
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the taxability of Unincorporated Joint Ventures involving revenue sharing arrangements and support services of business or commerce (BSS). The appellant provided cinema hall and infrastructure to a distributor for movie exhibition, without paying appropriate service tax. Referring to precedents like PVS Multiplex and Inox Leisure, the Tribunal held that service tax cannot be imposed on the appellant u/s BSS. The Supreme Court upheld this view, affirming the Tribunal's correctness. The case is now with the Division Bench for appeal decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.