<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CESTAT ruled no service tax on revenue shared with distributor for cinema hall services. In earlier case, Supreme Court upheld decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78486</link>
    <description>CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the taxability of Unincorporated Joint Ventures involving revenue sharing arrangements and support services of business or commerce (BSS). The appellant provided cinema hall and infrastructure to a distributor for movie exhibition, without paying appropriate service tax. Referring to precedents like PVS Multiplex and Inox Leisure, the Tribunal held that service tax cannot be imposed on the appellant u/s BSS. The Supreme Court upheld this view, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s correctness. The case is now with the Division Bench for appeal decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:16:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CESTAT ruled no service tax on revenue shared with distributor for cinema hall services. In earlier case, Supreme Court upheld decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78486</link>
      <description>CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the taxability of Unincorporated Joint Ventures involving revenue sharing arrangements and support services of business or commerce (BSS). The appellant provided cinema hall and infrastructure to a distributor for movie exhibition, without paying appropriate service tax. Referring to precedents like PVS Multiplex and Inox Leisure, the Tribunal held that service tax cannot be imposed on the appellant u/s BSS. The Supreme Court upheld this view, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s correctness. The case is now with the Division Bench for appeal decision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:16:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>