Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the taxability of Unincorporated Joint Ventures involving revenue sharing arrangements and support services of business or commerce (BSS). The appellant provided cinema hall and infrastructure to a distributor for movie exhibition, without paying appropriate service tax. Referring to precedents like PVS Multiplex and Inox Leisure, the Tribunal held that service tax cannot be imposed on the appellant u/s BSS. The Supreme Court upheld this view, affirming the Tribunal's correctness. The case is now with the Division Bench for appeal decision.
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the taxability of Unincorporated Joint Ventures involving revenue sharing arrangements and support services of business or commerce (BSS). The appellant provided cinema hall and infrastructure to a distributor for movie exhibition, without paying appropriate service tax. Referring to precedents like PVS Multiplex and Inox Leisure, the Tribunal held that service tax cannot be imposed on the appellant u/s BSS. The Supreme Court upheld this view, affirming the Tribunal's correctness. The case is now with the Division Bench for appeal decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.