Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner's attempt to absolve liability incurred by their deceased mother was rejected u/s 93 of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court quashed the impugned orders as they were issued post the mother's demise, remanding the case for fresh orders. The petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax for the remand process. The petition was allowed for remand.
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner's attempt to absolve liability incurred by their deceased mother was rejected u/s 93 of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court quashed the impugned orders as they were issued post the mother's demise, remanding the case for fresh orders. The petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax for the remand process. The petition was allowed for remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
