<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Violation of natural justice challenged in assessment orders due to discrepancies in tax returns. Orders quashed, case remitted for fresh assessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78471</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to absolve liability incurred by their deceased mother was rejected u/s 93 of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court quashed the impugned orders as they were issued post the mother&#039;s demise, remanding the case for fresh orders. The petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax for the remand process. The petition was allowed for remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:11:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:11:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Violation of natural justice challenged in assessment orders due to discrepancies in tax returns. Orders quashed, case remitted for fresh assessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78471</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner&#039;s attempt to absolve liability incurred by their deceased mother was rejected u/s 93 of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court quashed the impugned orders as they were issued post the mother&#039;s demise, remanding the case for fresh orders. The petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax for the remand process. The petition was allowed for remand.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:11:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>