Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner's attempt to absolve liability incurred by their deceased mother was rejected u/s 93 of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court quashed the impugned orders as they were issued post the mother's demise, remanding the case for fresh orders. The petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax for the remand process. The petition was allowed for remand.
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner's attempt to absolve liability incurred by their deceased mother was rejected u/s 93 of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court quashed the impugned orders as they were issued post the mother's demise, remanding the case for fresh orders. The petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax for the remand process. The petition was allowed for remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
