Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner's attempt to absolve liability incurred by their deceased mother was rejected u/s 93 of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court quashed the impugned orders as they were issued post the mother's demise, remanding the case for fresh orders. The petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax for the remand process. The petition was allowed for remand.
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders due to a mismatch in returns filed by the petitioner in GSTR 01 and GSTR 3B. The court found a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner's attempt to absolve liability incurred by their deceased mother was rejected u/s 93 of the TNGST Act, 2017. The court quashed the impugned orders as they were issued post the mother's demise, remanding the case for fresh orders. The petitioner must deposit 10% of disputed tax for the remand process. The petition was allowed for remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
