Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court considered the applicability of the MPID Act to...
Co-op banks & MPID Act: Fraud in loan distribution. Co-op banks not excluded from MPID Act. RBI supervision not enough. Different laws, different purposes.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The High Court considered the applicability of the MPID Act to Co-operative Banks as "Financial Establishments" u/s 2(d) of the MPID Act in a case involving fraud in loan distribution. The court held that co-operative banks, even if governed by the BR Act, are not excluded from the MPID Act's scope. While such banks are supervised by the RBI, the BR Act does not define or punish offenses like those under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, and 471. The court emphasized that the MPID Act's purpose is not fulfilled solely by bringing co-operative banks under the BR Act. The court dismissed the Criminal Writ Petition.
The High Court considered the applicability of the MPID Act to Co-operative Banks as "Financial Establishments" u/s 2(d) of the MPID Act in a case involving fraud in loan distribution. The court held that co-operative banks, even if governed by the BR Act, are not excluded from the MPID Act's scope. While such banks are supervised by the RBI, the BR Act does not define or punish offenses like those under IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, and 471. The court emphasized that the MPID Act's purpose is not fulfilled solely by bringing co-operative banks under the BR Act. The court dismissed the Criminal Writ Petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
