Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a co-operative bank registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act is excluded by implication from the ambit of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999 because the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 applies to such banks.
Analysis: The definition of "Financial Establishment" under Section 2(d) of the MPID Act expressly excludes only a corporation or co-operative society owned or controlled by the State or Central Government and a banking company under Section 5(c) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The fact that co-operative banks are brought within the regulatory sweep of the Banking Regulation Act by Section 56 does not, by itself, create an implied exclusion from the MPID Act. The two enactments operate in different spheres: the Banking Regulation Act provides regulatory control over banking institutions, whereas the MPID Act creates penal consequences to protect depositors against fraudulent defaults and related misconduct. The earlier understanding of co-operative banks under banking law did not answer the distinct question arising under the MPID Act.
Conclusion: A co-operative bank not owned or controlled by the State or Central Government is not excluded from the MPID Act by implication, and prosecution under Section 3 of the MPID Act can proceed.