Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment made, not outside it. Refund proceedings are akin to execution proceedings and cannot alter assessments. Appellant's voluntary tax payment without challenging assessment made it final. Without challenging assessment, refund claim is not maintainable. Refund proceedings based on a decision where appellant wasn't a party and without challenging assessment are to be rejected. No need to consider Section 11B of Excise Act. Appeal dismissed.
The case involves a challenge to a refund claim for service tax u/s unjust enrichment principles. CESTAT held that refund can only be granted based on the assessment made, not outside it. Refund proceedings are akin to execution proceedings and cannot alter assessments. Appellant's voluntary tax payment without challenging assessment made it final. Without challenging assessment, refund claim is not maintainable. Refund proceedings based on a decision where appellant wasn't a party and without challenging assessment are to be rejected. No need to consider Section 11B of Excise Act. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.