Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 and estimation of income from cash deposits u/s 69A. The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to comply with notices explaining the source of deposits. The CIT(A) mentioned that returns were filed after receiving notice u/s 148, but there was no evidence that the returns were treated as non-est by the AO. The assessee did not provide necessary details to the AO due to business cessation and joining government service. The Tribunal found that the assessee had filed returns for previous years and directed the AO to apply a net profit rate of 15% on total deposits for taxation, partially allowing the appeal.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 and estimation of income from cash deposits u/s 69A. The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to comply with notices explaining the source of deposits. The CIT(A) mentioned that returns were filed after receiving notice u/s 148, but there was no evidence that the returns were treated as non-est by the AO. The assessee did not provide necessary details to the AO due to business cessation and joining government service. The Tribunal found that the assessee had filed returns for previous years and directed the AO to apply a net profit rate of 15% on total deposits for taxation, partially allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
