Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 and estimation of income from cash deposits u/s 69A. The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to comply with notices explaining the source of deposits. The CIT(A) mentioned that returns were filed after receiving notice u/s 148, but there was no evidence that the returns were treated as non-est by the AO. The assessee did not provide necessary details to the AO due to business cessation and joining government service. The Tribunal found that the assessee had filed returns for previous years and directed the AO to apply a net profit rate of 15% on total deposits for taxation, partially allowing the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
