Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(C) for a defective notice related to TP adjustments. The AO determined arm's length OP/OC at 13.87% and made net additions based on differences in figures. The notice lacked specificity on the section invoked, contrary to legal requirements. Citing relevant case law, it was held that ambiguity in the notice is not sustainable. The provisions of Explanation-7 to section 271(1)(c) were also analyzed, emphasizing the need for a specific notice without ambiguity. The burden of proof lies on the assessee to establish bona fide and due diligence. Due to the ambiguous notice, the penalty order was ruled in favor of the assessee.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
