Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The Supreme Court addressed a case involving dishonour of cheque and time limitation. The party sought to quash proceedings, arguing the debt was time-barred u/s the summoning order date. SC held that determining if the debt was time-barred requires evidence. The issue involves a mixed question of law and fact not for the High Court u/s 482 CrPC. The Impugned Order was set aside, restoring proceedings to the Trial Court. The appeal was allowed.
The Supreme Court addressed a case involving dishonour of cheque and time limitation. The party sought to quash proceedings, arguing the debt was time-barred u/s the summoning order date. SC held that determining if the debt was time-barred requires evidence. The issue involves a mixed question of law and fact not for the High Court u/s 482 CrPC. The Impugned Order was set aside, restoring proceedings to the Trial Court. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
