https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78358 The Supreme Court addressed a case involving dishonour of cheque and time limitation. The party sought to quash proceedings, arguing the debt was time-barred u/s the summoning order date. SC held that determining if the debt was time-barred requires evidence. The issue involves a mixed question of law and fact not for the High Court u/s 482 CrPC. The Impugned Order was set aside, restoring proceedings to the Trial Court. The appeal was allowed. en-us Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:55:16 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:55:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78358 The Supreme Court addressed a case involving dishonour of cheque and time limitation. The party sought to quash proceedings, arguing the debt was time-barred u/s the summoning order date. SC held that determining if the debt was time-barred requires evidence. The issue involves a mixed question of law and fact not for the High Court u/s 482 CrPC. The Impugned Order was set aside, restoring proceedings to the Trial Court. The appeal was allowed. Highlights Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:55:16 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78358