Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The case involved classification of goods (hard pitch, extra hard pitch, soft pitch, total pitch, and PCM) under Central Excise Tariff Act. The issue was whether these should be classified as by-products u/s 2706 or under subheading 2708.11. The appellant argued that duty paid on certain products was not recorded. The Tribunal held that orders must align with the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and any charges beyond it are invalid. The duty was correctly quantified in the order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
The case involved classification of goods (hard pitch, extra hard pitch, soft pitch, total pitch, and PCM) under Central Excise Tariff Act. The issue was whether these should be classified as by-products u/s 2706 or under subheading 2708.11. The appellant argued that duty paid on certain products was not recorded. The Tribunal held that orders must align with the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and any charges beyond it are invalid. The duty was correctly quantified in the order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
