Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The case involved classification of goods (hard pitch, extra hard pitch, soft pitch, total pitch, and PCM) under Central Excise Tariff Act. The issue was whether these should be classified as by-products u/s 2706 or under subheading 2708.11. The appellant argued that duty paid on certain products was not recorded. The Tribunal held that orders must align with the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and any charges beyond it are invalid. The duty was correctly quantified in the order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
The case involved classification of goods (hard pitch, extra hard pitch, soft pitch, total pitch, and PCM) under Central Excise Tariff Act. The issue was whether these should be classified as by-products u/s 2706 or under subheading 2708.11. The appellant argued that duty paid on certain products was not recorded. The Tribunal held that orders must align with the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and any charges beyond it are invalid. The duty was correctly quantified in the order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
